The first hearing of the paper leak case was to be held in the Fast Track Court, but it was rejected due to the absence of the CBI lawyer. The case involves two accused, Dinesh Bival and Vikas Bival, who have been in jail for a month and a half.
Friends, on 23rd July PM Modi came and announced the fast track court through a post. After that, his reels are coming on various issues related to education. But today, the first hearing was to be held in the same fast track court on the issue of paper leak which was rejected. Now, there are two stories about it. One story is that the lawyer did not reach from the CBI in the fast track court. That's why the hearing was rejected. What does the CBI say that it is not so? So what is the whole story? What is the CBI's side? What happened in the court? and what should have happened in this video. My name is Saurabh Tripathi. You are watching News Pinch. My friend Vinay Sultan has come to know about this news in detail. He will tell you what the Fast Track Court is, what was being heard, in what matter. First of all, Vinay, tell us the matter. What was the paper leak? Actually, all the matters of the paper leak will be heard in the Rao's Avenue Court. As soon as the Prime Minister announced that we are making the Fast Track Court, The court means that a particular court is made for a particular case so that the hearing can be done quickly, the interval between one hearing and the other hearing should be less and the decision can be made quickly. So Delhi High Court had announced a particular court in Rouse Avenue Court. Today its first hearing was going to take place today. Now what happened is that the legal officer who was to be presented by the prosecution, The court did not take any action against him. In fact, in the case of the 13 accused in the case of 2026, two of them were accused, Dinesh Bival and Vikas Bival. They had a petition for bail. They had prayed for bail and there was a hearing on it. But the lawyer from the CBI could not reach there and due to this, the hearing was postponed to 3rd August. The court has also said that the legal officer and the lawyer should be declared as a lawyer. foreign Foreign The court in which the first hearing was held today was rejected and there is so much confusion in it. The case is not being prosecuted properly. The court is not yet in charge of the bail. We have been in jail for a month and a half. We will come back to this when the charge sheet comes. But until then we will be given bail. We are not going anywhere. We will not leave this country. He agrees on all kinds of conditions. And he says that we will present in court in every hearing. So this is the matter for now. But it was very important for optics that in the first case, even if their bail is the same, because they are in the court, they will not be able to get bail. If there is no hearing on it, then it has not been bailed. But if there is a hearing on it, if the bail petition was to be rejected, then it was rejected. Even if the court accepts the bail petition, but if there was a hearing, then it should have been done. So this situation is being created here. So the first optics is a little bit, it has not gone right in front of the people. Now in this matter, the next hearing will be held on 3rd August, so everyone will have an eye on it. - - So, to avoid such situations with any citizen, then after that, when the Nirbhaya case happened after 2012, then after 2012, this process started to speed up. In 2015, the 14th Financial Commission came, the 14th Chowdhury Association came, it made a budget of 500 crores and said that approximately 1800 fast rate courts should be opened in this country. And what are the circumstances now? Ujjwal Nikam, who is a famous lawyer, who fought the Kasab case, and now the parliament is in session. He asked this question in the parliament on 23rd July and in response to his question, the court of justice said that there are 775 fast rate courts in this country. Of which 398 courts are under POSCO. Under POCSO, which is the special act for children to protect them from sexual crimes. According to that, 398 courts are under POSCO. And when was this also made? criminal law amendment act came after 2018 so in 2019 because in 2013 you will remember that when the Nirbhaya case happened then the government had made a Nirbhaya fund of 1000 crores. While utilizing that fund, courts were formed in POCSOs and 398 courts were formed in POCSOs which was the central scheme under that and its expenses were being raised by the central and in this now 2,59,000 cases are pending. So between 2019 and 2026 you can put In the last 7 years, there have been around 250,000 cases of heinous crimes like Poxo. In cases where children were sexually assaulted, there are around 250,000 cases pending in the fast track courts. So, in such a situation, if the government says that we are making a fast track court, then all the things will not be solved by making a fast track court. This is a good step, a good start. The government cannot be criticized for everything. - Thank you.
